Concern Level: Medium-Low
From a moral standpoint, this is a very clean book. That being said, there is one main point we want to highlight. The central theme of the book put... → Continue reading below
Always, Clementine
VERDICT: Recommended
(with caution)
Concern Level: Medium-Low

Concern LevelMedium-Low
Concerning & Potentially Concerning Content
From a moral standpoint, this is a very clean book. That being said, there is one main point we want to highlight. The central theme of the book puts the full weight of all good and wise characters against the (seemingly evil) lab that Clementine, Rosie and Hamlet (the lovable animals of the book) are held in as the book opens. We are told the lab is keeping animals of all types to do scientific experimentation on. The unfolding story has characters researching what happens to animals in labs. This leads to the common children’s story setup where a complex issue gets oversimplified and seen from one side, getting amplified by the fact that in this case the animals are incredibly humanlike (we hear the story through Clemetine the mouse’s eyes) and because some of the presentation is a bit emotionally charged, such as when a news anchor suggests that the scientists will likely take this humanlike sweet mouse and “cut her open and study her brain”. This is further reinforced by an author’s note sharing further detail on her view of sad real-world situations. Now we are not in any way experts on animal testing done by scientists, but a few things need to be said on both sides. First off, we are called as humans to steward this beautiful creation that God originally declared good (very good when humans we, as steward, were created). Secondly, without even researching it, we can say that we have no doubt that sinful humanity has failed many, many times in this stewardship and that has certainly happened at the hands of scientists and companies working to maximize profit. But the idea that there are situations where science can potentially save human life by doing certain testing on animals first is one that can at a minimum be debated. The Bible clearly points to a difference between humans and animals. Without doubt, it is more nuanced and complex of an issue than to have it fully tackled in a secular children’s book so please take some time to walk a child through this. A few other minor items we will point out: The very start of the book can be a bit confusing. Clementine (a mouse) is recording letters to her friend Rosie (an ape), but at first we don’t know anything about them and how they got separated and Clementine isn’t writing the letters, but only dictating them out in her mind. You may need to help explain this. As a part of describing herself as an optimist, Clementine comments that she believes humans are “mostly good”. Luck is referenced a few times, such as when Pop calls mice “lucky”. The following comments are made: “holy smokes”, “could be ghosts”, “well, duh” (not really meant in a rude way) An older woman exclaims, “we’re gonna give ‘em heck tomorrow. You can bet your… tail on it!”. Later she says, “I would've said something other than ‘good golly’, but I’m led to believe this is a wholesome television program for children”. She also rudely says in passing, “who cares what Marty thinks”. A bad character randomly remarks, “You can never trust a Canadian”. A book called “The Witches” is referenced (presumably Ronald Dahl’s book) is brought up, to which a character replies, “I loved that book”. A chess move is called “Frankensein-Drakula variation” Clementine wonders if the secular events of the book “are my purpose”.
VerdictRecommended
Our Thoughts
God knew we really needed a nice, solid book to review (after a few hard to get through titles where we waded through page after page of modern moral lacking). The work that keeps coming to our mind with this one is “sweet”. Sweet characters and interaction between them. Kind dialogue. Just a nice read. The handling of the main consideration above may be something that pushes some parents to find a different title, but outside of that there is very little to say negatively about this one. Love of animals is a big focus. Chess is really highlighted as well, but the author includes it in a way where young readers can enjoy the book even if they have never played (or just don’t care for the game). This is one we have as Recommended.
Plot SummaryNote: This information is typically from the publisher.Use with caution
From the author of I, Cosmo comes a humor-filled, heart-tugging tale of a genius mouse, secretly freed from a lab, who's in search of a real home—and a way to free her old friends. Clementine is different from other mice: she can calculate the speed of light and she dreams in Latin. The scientists say she's a genius and put her through test after test. Clementine is proud of being a good lab mouse, but she's lonely. Her only snatches of friendship occur during her late-night visits with a chimpanzee named Rosie. When a compassionate lab technician frees Clementine, the mouse discovers an outside world full of wonders: Brussels sprouts, games of speed chess, television fame, and a chance for a real home. But for Clementine, it's not enough to be free when she knows that Rosie and the other mice are not. This tender, lively adventure story, narrated in letters from a mouse to a chimpanzee, shows us that goodness is something we have to define for ourselves—and that courage and wisdom aren't proportionate to size.
Purchase LinkAbove Reproach: We intentionally do NOT use referral links on this site. Purchase Book Convenience Link
We like the insight on this may being too much emotionally for the most sensitive readers.
Surprisingly, we think the “Violence & Scariness” is actually way overstated. Similarly, while we think “Strong anti-cruelty, anti-animal research message” is accurate, as we state above we feel it is more nuanced and complex than simply calling this a “positive message”. Obviously we would disagree with this secular site’s view that “Nonhuman characters are just as important as human ones”, which the Bible clearly refutes.
Read ReviewThis is a good example of why Christian parents need to be cautious. This site recommends books from “experts”, which sounds great, but doesn’t focus on presenting potentially concerning content.
Read ReviewMy dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires. Therefore, get rid of all moral filth and the evil that is so prevalent and humbly accept the word planted in you, which can save you. Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says. Anyone who listens to the word but does not do what it says is like someone who looks at his face in a mirror and, after looking at himself, goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like. But whoever looks intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, and continues in it—not forgetting what they have heard, but doing it—they will be blessed in what they do.
— James 1:19-25
More Christian Parent Reviews